\r\n\r\nThis could toggleable as well for people who don't want it.\r\n\r\n",[2892,2895],{"name":2893,"color":2894},"c: a11y","553F0B",{"name":2896,"color":2897},"s: needs decision","C453C3",1570,"Add icon for when media doesn't have alt text.","2023-02-03T02:26:51Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/1570",0.790813,{"description":2904,"labels":2905,"number":2907,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2874,"title":2908,"updated_at":2909,"url":2910,"score":2911},"## Proposal\r\n\r\n1. While composing a post, a red `[ NO ALT ]` badge (see example [here](https://chriscoyier.net/2023/01/25/musing-upon-an-alt-text-badge-on-images/)) should appear on each media without an ALT. When clicked, it will open the Edit dialog (it is basically the same as the Edit button).\r\n\r\n2. When clicking the Publish button, if there are images without ALT text, a dialog will appear that will show each of them with the input text to edit (same dialog as current edit could work) with two buttons: `[ Skip ]` `[ Done ]` (skip should be grayed, dimmed). Maybe for the last image, the Done button should read Publish.\r\n\r\n3. A new preference option should be added for users that would like to avoid the suggestion prompt. This option will be false by default, the feature is opt-out to encourage users. Currently, there is a similar feature in Twitter that is opt-in.\r\n\r\n## Context\r\n\r\nWe run a poll on [Mastodon](https://elk.zone/m.webtoo.ls/@patak/109732787938714669) and [Twitter](https://twitter.com/patak_dev/status/1617136714400600064) about UX to encourage users to add ALT to their attached images.\r\n\r\n\u003Cimg width=\"611\" alt=\"Mastodon poll results, see linked Post above\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/583075/216021585-6840e3ff-37f0-4c47-9b64-399c8d55e10d.png\">\r\n\r\n\u003Cimg width=\"596\" alt=\"Twitter poll results, see linked Tweet above\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/583075/216021418-b73f5c55-7910-437a-afd0-a57e0b7c185e.png\">\r\n\r\nSo suggesting + opt-out seems to be what most users will prefer/accept.\r\n\r\n@antfu [proposed](https://twitter.com/antfu7/status/1617173310235901953): \r\n> having an inline textbox with a placeholder, something like \"Add a description to the media make it more reachable\". Which could be a low intrusion way and no need for a config.\r\n\r\nFollowing a [discussion](https://twitter.com/toddlibby/status/1620721721375588353?s=20) with @colabottles, I think we could do both because the inline suggestion may avoid the prompt appearing in most cases.\r\n",[2906],{"name":2893,"color":2894},1552,"Encourage use of Alt text for attached media","2023-02-02T20:57:34Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/1552",0.7938322,{"description":2913,"labels":2914,"number":2916,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2918,"updated_at":2919,"url":2920,"score":2921},"It appears we are displaying a status containing sensitive media as if it is a spoiler, even though it has no CW / `spoiler_text`\r\n\r\nImplement logic so that Only the sensitive media is hidden/blurred instead of the whole status.\r\n\r\n## On Elk:\r\n\r\nhttps://elk.zone/fosstodon.org/@ayodev@mas.to/109457552157025274\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n## On Mastodon:\r\n\r\nhttps://mas.to/@ayodev/109457552070990933\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n",[2915],{"name":2866,"color":2867},318,"closed","Only blur/hide sensitive media instead of the whole status","2022-12-29T16:31:05Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/318",0.7381547,{"description":2923,"labels":2924,"number":2927,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2928,"updated_at":2929,"url":2930,"score":2931},"In this post https://elk.zone/mastodon.social/@Pwnallthethings/110341838593089566 , Elk shows info about hidden media, however the post does not have any media to show.\r\n\r\nThe following images shows hos Elk renders the post.\r\n\r\nWithout klicking \"Media hidden\":\r\n\r\n\r\nWhen klicking \"Media hidden\":\r\n\r\n",[2925,2926],{"name":2866,"color":2867},{"name":2869,"color":2870},2090,"Elk shows \"Media hidden\" but there is no media to show","2023-05-10T13:35:17Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/2090",0.7515797,{"description":2933,"labels":2934,"number":2936,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2937,"updated_at":2938,"url":2939,"score":2940},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\n\nAs a user I want to be able to disable autoplay on media, especially video, so that I can save on bandwidth when on mobile connection \n\n### Suggested solution\n\nAdd a setting to enable/disable autoplay. My preferred default option would be „off“, but that’s discussable.\n\n### Alternative\n\nDisable autoplay on mobile connections.\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\nI think I could work on a PR, if the preferred solution is discussed 😊",[2935],{"name":2869,"color":2870},1235,"Autoplay setting","2023-01-19T18:33:53Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/1235",0.76078606,{"description":2942,"labels":2943,"number":2946,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2947,"updated_at":2948,"url":2949,"score":2950},"\r\n",[2944,2945],{"name":2866,"color":2867},{"name":2869,"color":2870},1942,"video fullscreen button is disabled","2023-07-29T18:45:31Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/1942",0.76917493,{"description":2952,"labels":2953,"number":2955,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2956,"updated_at":2957,"url":2958,"score":2959},"posts with image marked as sensitive gets `Filtered by: undefined` and are shown as hidden posts.\r\n\r\nNot that the rest of the posts is not sensitive and they don't get hidden by Pinafore or Mastodon UI (only the image is hidden).",[2954],{"name":2866,"color":2867},400,"filtered by undefined","2022-12-12T18:20:43Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/400",0.7716126,{"description":2961,"labels":2962,"number":2964,"owner":2872,"repository":2873,"state":2917,"title":2965,"updated_at":2966,"url":2967,"score":2968},"### Pre-Checks\n\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A open a [GitHub Discussion](https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/discussions) or join our [Discord Chat Server](https://chat.elk.zone).\n- [X] Providing a screenshot or video to reproduce the issue or show visually what was meant.\n- [ ] I am willing to provide a PR.\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nWhen I'm publishing post with videos and images, actually It's a illegal, will cause a `422` error:\r\n\r\n\u003Cimg width=\"1322\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/49969959/212243380-7578d01d-8ac1-4f62-8d90-f97b333ac4ce.png\">\r\n\r\nBut seems like `elk` does not handing this boundary case. \r\n\r\nWe need to alert users that this is not legal before sending the request.\n\n### Reproduction video or screenshot\n\n_No response_\n\n### Additional Context\n\n_No response_",[2963],{"name":2866,"color":2867},1050,"Imperfect boundary handling for publishing posts when have videos and images.","2023-01-17T12:56:53Z","https://github.com/elk-zone/elk/issues/1050",0.7836256,["Reactive",2970],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",2973],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fBuyMENwBMQeB-JQDDuaBmvj-Z0tqKQy9-GQOlC4npQg":-1},"/elk-zone/elk/1440"]