\n \u003C/template>\n \u003C/UAccordion>\n\u003C/template>\n```\n\ndid i miss something?\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_",[2902,2905],{"name":2903,"color":2904},"enhancement","a2eeef",{"name":2906,"color":2907},"triage","ffffff",3868,"nuxt","ui","open","Allow assigning IDs to Nuxt UI Tab panels for scroll targeting","2025-04-12T08:35:52Z","https://github.com/nuxt/ui/issues/3868",0.71794015,{"description":2917,"labels":2918,"number":2922,"owner":2909,"repository":2923,"state":2924,"title":2925,"updated_at":2926,"url":2927,"score":2928},"\n",[2919],{"name":2920,"color":2921},"bug","ff281a",522,"nuxt.com","closed","Checkboxes broken on dark mode","2022-05-23T15:16:45Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt.com/issues/522",0.7045872,{"description":2930,"labels":2931,"number":2922,"owner":2909,"repository":2938,"state":2924,"title":2939,"updated_at":2940,"url":2941,"score":2928},"Hey I was using `mockNuxtImport` to mock 2 different users from a nuxt composable in the same test file. It seems to use the last `mockNuxtImport` that is called in the file, not the one scoped to the test.\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nit('renders the users email', () => {\r\n\tmockNuxtImport('useSupabaseUser', () => {\r\n\t\treturn () => mockUser\r\n\t})\r\n\r\n\trender(User)\r\n\r\n\texpect(screen.getByText('jdoe@gmail.com')).toBeInTheDocument()\r\n})\r\n\r\nit('renders the Error when there is no user', () => {\r\n\tmockNuxtImport('useSupabaseUser', () => {\r\n\t\treturn () => {}\r\n\t})\r\n\r\n\trender(User)\r\n\r\n\texpect(screen.getByText('Error')).toBeInTheDocument()\r\n})\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe first test fails here as it thinks `useSupabaseUser` returns {}\r\n\r\nI did manage to get this working with a global variable:\r\n\r\n```ts\r\nlet mockUser = { id: 1, name: 'John Doe', email: 'jdoe@gmail.com' }\r\n\r\nmockNuxtImport('useSupabaseUser', () => {\r\n\treturn () => mockUser\r\n})\r\n\r\nit('renders the users email', () => {\r\n\trender(User)\r\n\r\n\texpect(screen.getByText('jdoe@gmail.com')).toBeInTheDocument()\r\n})\r\n\r\nit('renders the Error when there is no user', () => {\r\n\tmockUser = {}\r\n\r\n\trender(User)\r\n\r\n\texpect(screen.getByText('Error')).toBeInTheDocument()\r\n})\r\n```\r\n\r\nNot really sure if this is expected, it seems a little strange to me, so figured I post my findings.",[2932,2935],{"name":2933,"color":2934},"documentation","0075ca",{"name":2936,"color":2937},"vitest-environment","b60205","test-utils","Mocking multiple iterations of nuxt imports in the same test file","2024-01-24T12:25:29Z","https://github.com/nuxt/test-utils/issues/522",{"description":2943,"labels":2944,"number":2945,"owner":2909,"repository":2923,"state":2924,"title":2946,"updated_at":2947,"url":2948,"score":2949},"Use the same component for aside filters on modules and showcase + Add icons on modules\n\n- [x] Merge components\n- [ ] Refactor types\n- [ ] Add icons",[],1149,"[Aside] Use same component","2023-06-06T12:14:41Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt.com/issues/1149",0.7086733,{"description":2951,"labels":2952,"number":2959,"owner":2909,"repository":2909,"state":2924,"title":2960,"updated_at":2961,"url":2962,"score":2963},"### Environment\n\n- Operating System: `Darwin`\r\n- Node Version: `v19.5.0`\r\n- Nuxt Version: `3.2.3`\r\n- Nitro Version: `2.2.3`\r\n- Package Manager: `npm@9.3.1`\r\n- Builder: `vite`\r\n- User Config: `modules`, `runtimeConfig`, `content`, `image`, `googleFonts`\r\n- Runtime Modules: `@nuxt/content@2.5.2`, `@nuxtjs/google-fonts@3.0.0`, `@nuxt/image-edge@1.0.0-27968280.9739e4d`\r\n- Build Modules: `-`\r\n\n\n### Reproduction\n\nThe following code fetches search results. It's automatically refreshed when the searchquery ref is changed.\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nconst navSearchAPICall = useLazyAsyncData(\r\n 'searchWorking',\r\n () => $fetch('/api/search', {\r\n params: {\r\n query: searchquery.value\r\n }\r\n }),\r\n { \r\n server: false,\r\n watch: [searchquery]\r\n }\r\n)\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis works as expected. But the following code, wich should behave the same according to the documentation, does not work. The request is refreshed when the searchquery ref changes, but the query parameters stay the same.\r\n\r\n```javascript\r\nconst searchAPICall = useLazyFetch('/api/search', {\r\n key: 'searchNotWorking',\r\n params: {\r\n query: searchquery.value\r\n },\r\n server: false,\r\n watch: [searchquery]\r\n }\r\n)\r\n```\r\n\r\n\r\n\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nAs described in the reproduction, when using `useLazyAsyncData`, the request is refreshed with updated query parameters according to the searchquery ref. \r\n\r\nBut when using `useLazyFetch`, the request is refreshed but sent with unchanged query parameters.\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Logs\n\n_No response_",[2953,2956],{"name":2954,"color":2955},"3.x","29bc7f",{"name":2957,"color":2958},"pending triage","E99695",19665,"useLazyFetch does not behave like useLazyAsyncData","2023-03-14T11:09:45Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/19665",0.709409,{"description":2965,"labels":2966,"number":2973,"owner":2909,"repository":2909,"state":2924,"title":2974,"updated_at":2975,"url":2976,"score":2977},"### Describe the feature\n\nWe are using Laravel Precognition feature to validate forms server-side before we actually submit them.\r\n\r\nBy default we use useFetch, and simply add the header required by this feature to perform the validation instead of the actual request.\r\nSince useFetch deduplicates identical requests by default, our validation request is actually the request that gets cached. This means that when we actually want to make the request, we just get our cached response back instantly, which does not actually do anything.\r\n\r\nWe traced this down to this line https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/876fa7f3136129097ae3d04acff1dac87f2d2a90/packages/nuxt/src/app/composables/fetch.ts#L88\r\n\r\nSince we don't actually change the body, url, or params, the cache is hit.\r\n\r\nI think it would be sensible to also include the headers in the caching key.\n\n### Additional information\n\n- [X] Would you be willing to help implement this feature?\n- [ ] Could this feature be implemented as a module?\n\n### Final checks\n\n- [X] Read the [contribution guide](https://nuxt.com/docs/community/contribution).\n- [X] Check existing [discussions](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/discussions) and [issues](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues).",[2967,2968,2970],{"name":2954,"color":2955},{"name":2920,"color":2969},"d73a4a",{"name":2971,"color":2972},"🔨 p3-minor","FBCA04",23455,"Consider headers in useFetch key","2023-10-26T20:10:49Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/23455",0.7150354,{"description":2979,"labels":2980,"number":2982,"owner":2909,"repository":2983,"state":2924,"title":2984,"updated_at":2985,"url":2986,"score":2987},"### 🐛 The bug\n\nUsing proxy from `useScriptClarity` to accept/decline consent doesn't work. The consent updates only after reloading the page (when using cookies/local storage instead of simple refs in useConsent file). When I tried using `window.clarity`, Clarity cookies update as expected.\n\n### 🛠️ To reproduce\n\nhttps://stackblitz.com/edit/nuxt-starter-cohqlgef?file=nuxt.config.ts\n\n### 🌈 Expected behavior\n\nCookies should update as expected.\n\n### ℹ️ Additional context\n\nInstead of viewing the preview window in StackBlitz use this link - https://nuxtstartercohqlgef-ptbs--3000--33edf5bb.local-credentialless.webcontainer.io. It seems cookies don't work in StackBlitz at all.\n\nMaybe I'm using the `useScriptClarity` composable wrong, but I'm not sure.",[2981],{"name":2920,"color":2969},442,"scripts","Clarity proxy not working","2025-04-16T08:12:32Z","https://github.com/nuxt/scripts/issues/442",0.71709436,{"description":2989,"labels":2990,"number":2995,"owner":2909,"repository":2909,"state":2924,"title":2996,"updated_at":2997,"url":2998,"score":2999},"### Describe the feature\n\nWhen usefetch makes network requests, the parameters of the second request depend on the response result of the first interface. If usefetch is nested, an error will be returned, indicating that usefetch can only be used by setup. If $fetch is used, both client and server will be triggered once. What's the solution\r\n\r\n\n\n### Additional information\n\n- [X] Would you be willing to help implement this feature?\n- [ ] Could this feature be implemented as a module?\n\n### Final checks\n\n- [X] Read the [contribution guide](https://nuxt.com/docs/community/contribution).\n- [X] Check existing [discussions](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/discussions) and [issues](https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues).",[2991,2992,2993],{"name":2954,"color":2955},{"name":2957,"color":2958},{"name":2994,"color":2972},"needs reproduction",26529,"When usefetch makes network requests, the parameters of the second request depend on the response result of the first interface. If usefetch is nested, an error will be returned, indicating that usefetch can only be used by setup. If $fetch is used, both client and server will be triggered once. What's the solution","2024-03-30T01:44:56Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/26529",0.7187995,{"labels":3001,"number":3004,"owner":2909,"repository":2909,"state":2924,"title":3005,"updated_at":3006,"url":3007,"score":3008},[3002,3003],{"name":2954,"color":2955},{"name":2957,"color":2958},13982,"`useFetch` does not refresh when a params object is used","2023-01-22T21:12:40Z","https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/issues/13982",0.72342706,{"description":3010,"labels":3011,"number":3017,"owner":2909,"repository":2910,"state":2924,"title":3018,"updated_at":3019,"url":3020,"score":3021},"### Description\n\nHi, would be great to have a closeAll on the useOverlay. Usefull especially if you have 2+ overlays\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_",[3012,3013,3016],{"name":2903,"color":2904},{"name":3014,"color":3015},"v3","49DCB8",{"name":2906,"color":2907},3953,"useOverlay closeAll","2025-04-25T13:04:04Z","https://github.com/nuxt/ui/issues/3953",0.725156,["Reactive",3023],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",3026],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fL6vR_lHgLAZcPybp79VEBov8lUh_V2HJ0k8fKzT5l5o":-1},"/nuxt/test-utils/586"]