\r\n\u003C/a>\r\n\r\n## What this would _(hopefully)_ enable \r\n\r\n> Each of these could be implemented already, but it'd likely make things quite convoluted\r\n\r\n- Procedure call batching - #273\r\n- WebSocket transport - #268\r\n- More robust subscription support\r\n- Our own query cache, as a plugin\r\n- Logging & devtools\r\n- Supplying \"retry\" links\r\n- Moving transformers to a plugin\r\n- Would make creating libs for Svelte/Vue/etc easier\r\n- Potentially, move away from relying on react-query in `@trpc/react` and make trpc lighter (unlikely to happen though)\r\n",[2896,2899,2902],{"name":2897,"color":2898},"🙋♂️ help wanted","008672",{"name":2900,"color":2901},"@trpc/client","6095C2",{"name":2903,"color":2904},"🧙🏻 typescript wizardry","391441",412,"Implement exchanges/middlewares to make client more pluggable","2022-10-05T00:09:54Z","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/412",0.70010877,{"description":2911,"labels":2912,"number":2917,"owner":2860,"repository":2860,"state":2861,"title":2918,"updated_at":2919,"url":2920,"score":2921},"**👉👉👉👉 Update:** For tRPC support of public-facing APIs, please use `trpc-openapi`: https://github.com/jlalmes/trpc-openapi\r\n\r\n\r\n---\r\n\r\nIt would be nice if there was a way to easily expose tRPC-endpoints as REST (or GraphQL) for people who want to use tRPC for a public API and is a bit more intuitive. Could potentially drive adoption a bit more.\r\n\r\nSee #752 for an example of what gets confusing.\r\n\r\n... been thinking a bit about it, but it's not obvious how it could work. \r\n\r\nMaybe doing some sort of API-builder... or something where you define your API schema which then does automatic mapping to tRPC. \r\n\r\nI'm also thinking that it might not be needed - `JSON.stringify(encodeURIComponent(x))` is hard when you toy around with manual API-requests, but it's not that bad when you're actually working with the API, as it's only needed once.\r\n\r\n## Current implementation, HTTP Methods \u003C-> Type mapping\r\n\r\n| HTTP Method | Mapping | Notes |\r\n| ----------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\r\n| `GET` | `.query()` | Input JSON-stringified in query param.\u003Cbr/>_e.g._ `?input=${JSON.stringify(encodeURIComponent(input))` |\r\n| `POST` | `.mutation()` | Input as post body. | \r\n\r\n## Considerations with OpenAPI\r\n\r\n- Resources are usually `/{resource}/{id}?param1=x¶m2=y`-style - tRPC is [currently] with `{resource}?input=JSON.stringify(encodeURIComponent(input))`-style\r\n- JSON-RPC based response shape might not be the ideal response shape for OpenAPI\r\n- An output schema usually have a `$ref`-schema which would be possible to do automatically / first feature people would request is to make different paths request the same input type\r\n- Actually using zod or any other validation on a resolver's `output` would slow down API outputs.\r\n\r\n## Related\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/trpc/trpc/discussions/271\r\n",[2913,2914],{"name":2897,"color":2898},{"name":2915,"color":2916},"💬 discussion","4B318A",755,"[RFC] Using tRPC for public-facing APIs (OpenAPI/Swagger/etc)","2022-06-19T00:48:45Z","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/755",0.7014346,{"description":2923,"labels":2924,"number":2928,"owner":2860,"repository":2860,"state":2861,"title":2929,"updated_at":2930,"url":2931,"score":2932},"> Also, as you're pointing out, RSC will hopefully fix this for us. I don't want to put too much more effort into `withTRPC` in it's current form as it will _hopefully_ be deprecated pretty soon (that said, for v10, we should probably make sure we have an API design that makes it tree shakable when/if that happens 😅 )\r\n>\r\n> _Originally posted by @KATT in https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/2625#issuecomment-1240397342_\r\n\r\n\r\nMaybe we should move the `withTRPC` to it's own `import` so it can be tree-shaken when/if [RSC](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/react-18/server-components) or the [Next.js Layouts](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) arrives so it can be tree-shaken as it will will likely have to be non-compatible to that API or make a bunch of stuff redundant.\r\n\r\n\r\n## Suggested change\r\n\r\n\r\n#### Before\r\n\r\n```tsx\r\n\r\n// _app.tsx\r\nimport { AppType } from 'next/dist/shared/lib/utils';\r\nimport { ReactElement, ReactNode } from 'react';\r\nimport { trpc } from '~/utils/trpc';\r\n\r\nconst MyApp: AppType = (({ Component, pageProps }) => {\r\n return \u003CComponent {...pageProps} />;\r\n})\r\n\r\nexport default trpc.withTRPC(MyApp);\r\n```\r\n\r\n#### After\r\n\r\n> Not thrilled about exactly this API-design, but gets the point across that `withTRPC()` can be tree shaken, feel free to do other suggestions\r\n\r\n```ts\r\n// _app.tsx\r\nimport { AppType } from 'next/dist/shared/lib/utils';\r\nimport { trpc } from '~/utils/trpc';\r\nimport { createTRPCNextWithTRPC } from '@trpc/next';\r\n\r\nconst MyApp: AppType = (({ Component, pageProps }) => {\r\n return \u003CComponent {...pageProps} />;\r\n})\r\n\r\nexport default createWithTRPC(trpc)(MyApp);\r\n```\r\n",[2925],{"name":2926,"color":2927},"RFC","78B062",2650,"Break out `withTRPC` from `createTRPCNext`?","2022-11-04T00:06:57Z","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/2650",0.7026878,{"description":2934,"labels":2935,"number":2939,"owner":2860,"repository":2860,"state":2861,"title":2940,"updated_at":2941,"url":2942,"score":2943},"### New doc sections\r\n\r\n- **HTTP RPC Specification** -> https://trpc.io/docs/rpc\r\n- **Subscriptions / WebSockets** -> https://trpc.io/docs/subscriptions\r\n\r\n\r\nAny feedback? Feel free to modify or write here and I'll update\r\n\r\n\r\ncc @mmkal @Lilja @danielyogel @cyrus-za @peterp @anthonyshort ",[2936],{"name":2937,"color":2938},"🙏 review please","A7356F",898,"[RFC] New docs ","2022-10-04T18:08:24Z","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/898",0.70277786,{"description":2945,"labels":2946,"number":2954,"owner":2860,"repository":2860,"state":2861,"title":2955,"updated_at":2956,"url":2957,"score":2958},"So. We're making a new major. \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n## Goals\r\n\r\n- **More ergonomic API for creating procedures** and building out your backend\r\n- **CMD+Click** from your frontend and jump straight into the backend procedure. This will work with `react-query` as well!\r\n- **Better scaling** than the current structure - the TypeScript server starts choking a bit when you get close to 100 procedures in your backend\r\n- **Fully backward compatible** for the 99% use-case with a migration path which you can do incrementally. \r\n\r\n\r\n## Todos\r\n\r\n> **Important for contributors:** All of the work here is related to the [`next`](https://github.com/trpc/trpc/tree/next) branch.\r\n\r\n\r\nTracked in https://github.com/orgs/trpc/projects/1\r\n\r\n- [x] New Router API\r\n - [x] Tracked in [trpc/v10-playground](https://github.com/trpc/v10-playground) - the current winning proposal is https://github.com/trpc/v10-playground/pull/33\r\n - [x] Error formatting in new API - [`formatError()`](https://trpc.io/docs/error-formatting)-equivalent. \r\n - [x] `meta`-equivalent\r\n - [x] Maybe we need a `createRootRouter()` that additionally accepts `{ transformer: X, formatError: Y}`\r\n - [x] Implement new API in tRPC\r\n - [x] Make old routers compatible (`.legacy()` at the end to transform them to the new version)\r\n- [x] New client API with backward compatibility \r\n - Maybe old can be `client.query('postById', input, options)` whilst new stuff can be `client.queries.postById({ input, ...options})`\r\n- [x] New react-query API with backward compat\r\n- [ ] Make actual issues for all of these\r\n- [x] Add all old projects in a folder (copy/paste `examples/*` to `examples/.test` so we can track breaking changes easily and make sure we remain backward compatible for a long time\r\n- [ ] Rewrite `TRPCClient` to be functional instead of a class but reuse the same interface\r\n- [ ] Write a migration guide\r\n - [ ] New router API\r\n - [ ] New links\r\n- [x] Move transformers back to `runtime` to make it backward compatible\r\n- [ ] Explore: Add [`stripInternal`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig#stripInternal)-flag\r\n- [x] Simplify HTTP-responses\r\n- [x] New links architecture (#1366)\r\n- [ ] Refactor observables implementation to have `unknown` errors or make it guaranteed to be `TRPCClientError` of some sort. \r\n- [ ] Make transformers dynamically opt-in similar to how a batch request is indicated by `?batch=1` maybe a transformed request could be `?transform=1` or `transform=TRANSFORMER_NAME`?\r\n- [ ] Write a blog post about new major and API.\r\n- [ ] \"Marketing\"? Hype video, new website, etc\r\n- [ ] Decide on structure for react-query integration\r\n- [ ] Add old website on `www/`-docs as `v9.trpc.io`\r\n - [ ] Link it in Docusaurus\r\n - [ ] Make sure we have deployment for a \"v9\"-branch\r\n\r\n### Stretch\r\n\r\n- [ ] Add DTO for clients without transformers - #1694\r\n- [x] #1597\r\n- [x] New Subscriptions API (nice to have) - #1596 \r\n- [ ] `trpc.output.snapshot()` https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/3435\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003Cdetails>\u003Csummary>Old notes\u003C/summary>\r\n\r\n## Definite\r\n\r\n- [x] Remove official support for node `12.x`\r\n - [x] Remove E2E-test for 12.x\r\n - [x] Change `tsconfig` build target\r\n- [ ] Add official support for node `16.x`\r\n- [ ] Add `stripInternal`-flag\r\n- [x] Remove all `@deprecated` stuff\r\n - [x] Remove `LegacyRouter` introduced in #915\r\n - [ ] [...]\r\n- [x] New links architecture (#1366)\r\n- [ ] Move official support for `react-query` `3` to `4`\r\n- [ ] Simplify HTTP-responses\r\n - [ ] From `{ id:null, result: {type: 'data', data: x } }` -> `{ result: { data: x } }`\r\n - [ ] maybe remove `id: null` from HTTP responses?\r\n- [ ] Migration guides for all changed parts\r\n - [ ] New Links\r\n\r\n\r\n## Maybe ❓ \r\n\r\n> Feedback please!\r\n\r\n\r\n- [x] Optimize so router inference only needs to be done once? #1218 \r\n- [ ] ~Update so procedures needs to return `{ data: x }` instead of just `x` so we could add metadata and potentially discriminated union of `{ data: x } | { error: y }` ~\r\n- [x] Decide: \r\n - Pipe-based rather than object resolvers? `{ input: z.string(), resolve({input}) {}}` -> `t.pipe(t.input(z.string), ({input}) => \r\n - Chained resolvers\r\n- [x] Plan how to deal with degrading typescript performance when approaching ~100 procedures (there are no runtime issues, but the DX slows down) \r\n- [ ] Turn `client.query` result into `[ output, { meta } ]`\r\n- [ ] New `useQuery()` API that expects suspense as default - See this gist: https://gist.github.com/KATT/aa1ad532d6e57520b942f657569e1505\r\n- [ ] Refactor `@trpc/server` to easier work with CloudFlare-workers etc (#1375)\r\n- [ ] Collaborate with Blitz.js? https://github.com/blitz-js/blitz/discussions/3083#discussioncomment-1841427\r\n- [ ] https://jsonapi.org/format/\r\n\r\n### Transformers\r\n\r\n- [x] Turn transformers into a link on the client (#1366)\r\n- [ ] Revert above and put transformers back to runtime 😬 \r\n- [ ] ~Turn transformers into a middleware on the server~\r\n- [ ] Make transformers dynamically opt-in similar to how a batch request is indicated by `?batch=1` maybe a transformed request could be `?transform=1` or `transform=TRANSFORMER_NAME`?\r\n\r\n### Misc\r\n\r\n- [ ] Rename `@trpc/react/ssg` -> `@trpc/react/ssr` & `createSSGHelpers` -> `createServerSideHelpers` (or something, as it is often used in `getServerSideProps()` as well as `getStaticProps()`)\r\n\r\n## Open questions\r\n\r\n- Should we continue to follow OpenRPC?\r\n- Any changes that could make tRPC easier to support stuff like Svelte/Vue?\r\n- Any changes that could make tRPC stricter support stuff like AWS Lambdas? (Already is doable to do Lambdas but through an Express->Lambda converter) #882 \r\n- Ideas?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\u003C/details>",[2947,2948,2951],{"name":2937,"color":2938},{"name":2949,"color":2950},"💸 Get paid!","c2e0c6",{"name":2952,"color":2953},"next-major/definite","5319E7",887,"[RFC] Next major overview","2022-12-19T22:11:47Z","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/887",0.7057662,{"description":2960,"labels":2961,"number":2962,"owner":2860,"repository":2860,"state":2861,"title":2963,"updated_at":2871,"url":2964,"score":2965},"### Describe the feature you'd like to request\n\nstricter typings for [transformTRPCResponseItem](https://github.com/trpc/trpc/blob/c1b3844de8f366fb8c0409e7a12c5a104e8616ab/packages/server/src/internals/transformTRPCResponse.ts#L4)\n\n### Describe the solution you'd like to see\n\nInference for the `router` parameter in the `transformTRPCResponseItem` function.\r\nSomehow typing `_def` to have a `transformers` field of type [`CombinedDataTransformer`](https://github.com/trpc/trpc/blob/c1b3844de8f366fb8c0409e7a12c5a104e8616ab/packages/server/src/transformer.ts#L14).\n\n### Desribe alternate solutions\n\nI worked around this in my app ([a template that wires up vite-electron-trpc-prisma ](https://github.com/NickyMeuleman/electron-trpc-prisma)) where I had to copypaste the `transformTRPCResponseItem` function by using the appRouter for my app directly, but that wouldn't be possible in the library code.\n\n### Additional information\n\n\r\n\r\nI don't have much TypeScript knowledge, and am wondering what the recommended way to achieve this might be.\n\n### 👨👧👦 Contributing\n\n- [X] 🙋♂️ Yes, I'd be down to file a PR implementing this feature!",[],2804,"feat: typings for transformTRPCResponseItem","https://github.com/trpc/trpc/issues/2804",0.71156156,["Reactive",2967],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",2970],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fw_QQGnvkKo79oBjeJSB_SBdq0M9BOUsRS2WdpxInEBg":-1},"/trpc/trpc/2338"]