\r\n\n\n### Steps to reproduce\n\n.\n\n### Expected behavior\n\n_No response_\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n\"next-d126cf9e35\"\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]",[3057,3060],{"name":3058,"color":3059},"bug","d73a4a",{"name":3044,"color":3045},4677,"`tag` pipelines are missing avatar and commit title","2025-01-12T06:19:42Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4677",0.7576814,{"description":3067,"labels":3068,"number":3073,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3034,"title":3074,"updated_at":3075,"url":3076,"score":3077},"I think we should have a look at https://nextcloud.com/contribute/ and chery-pick some ideas from that",[3069,3072],{"name":3070,"color":3071},"documentation","7D625D",{"name":3047,"color":3048},4113,"Improve docs about starting to contribute","2024-09-15T09:47:05Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4113",0.7693056,{"description":3079,"labels":3080,"number":3082,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3034,"title":3083,"updated_at":3084,"url":3085,"score":3086},"### Component\n\nserver\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nRestarting a pipeline that failed due to missing secrets is not enough.\r\nI have seen it in a tag event.\r\n```\r\nsecret \"***\" not found or not allowed to be used\r\n```\r\nThen I added the secret and restarted the pipeline and the error changed to\r\n```\r\n[generic]\r\npipeline definition not found\r\n```\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n{\"source\":\"https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker\",\"version\":\"next-5a7e314f5a\"}\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\nMight be related to https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1678\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A join our [Discord Chat Server](https://discord.gg/fcMQqSMXJy) or the [Matrix room](https://matrix.to/#/#woodpecker:matrix.org).",[3081],{"name":3058,"color":3059},2982,"Restarting a pipeline that failed due to missing secrets is not enough","2024-12-08T12:10:58Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2982",0.77086115,{"description":3088,"labels":3089,"number":3093,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3034,"title":3094,"updated_at":3095,"url":3096,"score":3097},"we should create a dedicated module who handle the shutdown context logic ...\r\n\r\nand make it so we dont have to switch out an global context but rather influence it ...\r\n\r\nbased on #3895 and #3896 pre-work",[3090],{"name":3091,"color":3092},"refactor","4f8cc9",3907,"Refactor note: move shutdown context creation into own module","2024-07-14T00:27:20Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/3907",0.77238685,{"description":3099,"labels":3100,"number":3103,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3034,"title":3104,"updated_at":3105,"url":3106,"score":3107},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\n\nWhen following the logs of a step I would like the UI to automatically select the next step if the step I am currently looking at has finished.\n\n### Suggested solution\n\nAutomatically jump to the next step when currently visible step status changes to successfully finished.\n\n### Alternative\n\n_No response_\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3101,3102],{"name":3044,"color":3045},{"name":3047,"color":3048},3801,"Log jump to next step when finished","2024-06-24T11:59:39Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/3801",0.77394354,{"description":3109,"labels":3110,"number":3113,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3034,"title":3114,"updated_at":3115,"url":3116,"score":3117},"https://ci.woodpecker-ci.org/repos/8987/pipeline/94/errors\r\n\r\nversion: current main",[3111,3112],{"name":3058,"color":3059},{"name":3024,"color":3025},4249,"[Bug] MultiForge: second forge can not be used","2024-10-25T17:33:00Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4249",0.77622604,{"description":3119,"labels":3120,"number":3128,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3129,"title":3130,"updated_at":3131,"url":3132,"score":3133},"like the agent:\r\nhttps://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/205f8ecc1649ab48a9d5fb52b0ecd7b8c24abf4f/docker/Dockerfile.agent.multiarch#L21\r\n\r\nref https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#healthcheck\r\n\r\nTODO:\r\n- [ ] add subcommand to server that can test against https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/205f8ecc1649ab48a9d5fb52b0ecd7b8c24abf4f/server/router/router.go#L69\r\n- [ ] use subcommand in container",[3121,3122,3125],{"name":3024,"color":3025},{"name":3123,"color":3124},"feature","180DBE",{"name":3126,"color":3127},"good first issue","76ea72",1943,"closed","Add an healthcheck to server container","2023-07-25T13:55:31Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1943",0.7097607,{"description":3135,"labels":3136,"number":3139,"owner":3032,"repository":3033,"state":3129,"title":3140,"updated_at":3141,"url":3142,"score":3143},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\r\n\r\nIt doesn't make much sense to duplicate the repositories in the `last visited` block too, if there are \u003C=4 in total\r\n\r\n\r\nBesides, odd number of items look not so smooth.\r\n\r\n### Suggested solution\r\n\r\nDo not display `last visited` block if there are only four repositories\r\n\r\n### Alternative\r\n\r\nUse [repos pinning](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4424#issuecomment-2493207007)\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\r\nWoodpecker `next-9f0611d1a1`, Gitea `1.22.4`, Postgres `16`\r\n\r\n### Validations\r\n\r\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\r\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\r\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3137,3138],{"name":3044,"color":3045},{"name":3047,"color":3048},4517,"Do not show last visited repos if there is less than 4 in total","2025-01-20T15:23:54Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4517",0.7455308,["Reactive",3145],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",3148],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fhwOi67m_4C3j4koUfc0gJ89kpZZzrFlB0VzN-Jy0r-Y":-1},"/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/3553"]