\n\n### Expected behavior\n\n```\ndocker run --rm --privileged \\\n -v $(pwd):/woodpecker \\\n -e PLUGIN_REPO=demo/myap \\\n -e PLUGIN_TAGS=latest \\\n -e PLUGIN_PLATFORMS=linux/amd64 \\\n -e PLUGIN_DOCKERFILE=Dockerfile \\\n -e PLUGIN_DRIVER=docker \\\n -e PLUGIN_BUILDKIT_DRIVEROPT=\"image=moby/buildkit:master\" \\\n -w /woodpecker \\\n woodpeckerci/plugin-docker-buildx:5.2.2-insecure\n```\n\n\u003Cimg width=\"2083\" height=\"456\" alt=\"Image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/763aa4cd-edc1-4e07-b043-44b5d153d962\" />\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\ndocker desktop v4.43.1\n```\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [x] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [x] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [x] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/versions]",[3068],{"name":3069,"color":3070},"bug","d73a4a",5321,"plugin-docker-buildx insecure with PLUGIN_BUILDKIT_DRIVEROPT image not work after version 6","2025-07-22T14:24:24Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/5321",0.72221994,{"description":3077,"labels":3078,"number":3083,"owner":3024,"repository":3025,"state":3035,"title":3084,"updated_at":3085,"url":3086,"score":3087},"After switching to the v2.1.0 docker image for woodpecker, the admin interface says to update to the current version.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThis is from the docker image: `woodpeckerci/woodpecker-server:v2.1.0` ",[3079,3080],{"name":3069,"color":3070},{"name":3081,"color":3082},"ui","46DEA2",3034,"Update notice showing for v2.1.0 while already on v2.1.0","2023-12-27T16:36:08Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/3034",0.72597,{"description":3089,"labels":3090,"number":3092,"owner":3024,"repository":3025,"state":3035,"title":3093,"updated_at":3094,"url":3095,"score":3096},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\n\nWhen running inside kubernetes/docker without externally reachable domains, the .local and .localhost domains can be used for browser based access.\r\nThese point to 127.0.0.1 which does not work for inter-container connectivity.\n\n### Suggested solution\n\nAn optional, separate env for the API of gitea server for OAuth and API requests that is separate from the URL that is accessed by the browser of the user would fix that.\n\n### Alternative\n\n_No response_\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3091],{"name":3021,"color":3022},3470,"Provide a separate WOODPECKER_GITEA_API_URL for easier local setup","2024-03-21T10:37:03Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/3470",0.7261702,{"description":3098,"labels":3099,"number":3104,"owner":3024,"repository":3025,"state":3035,"title":3105,"updated_at":3106,"url":3107,"score":3108},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\n\nhttps://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/next/administration/backends/kubernetes#volumes\r\n\r\nMake reference to \r\n```\r\n settings:\r\n mount:\r\n - \"woodpecker-cache\"\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhich is no longer supported when used with things like `command:`\r\n\r\n\n\n### Suggested solution\n\nRemoving that part, and including a sample PVC like \r\n\r\n```\r\napiVersion: v1\r\nkind: PersistentVolumeClaim\r\nmetadata:\r\n name: woodpecker-cache\r\nspec:\r\n storageClassName: \"longhorn\"\r\n accessModes:\r\n - ReadWriteMany\r\n resources:\r\n requests:\r\n storage: 1Gi\r\n```\r\n\r\nMight go well to enhancing this part of the documentation.\n\n### Alternative\n\nAlternatively, just removing that settings part and providing a link to the kubernetes docs (https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/persistent-volumes/) might serve as well.\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3100,3101],{"name":3044,"color":3045},{"name":3102,"color":3103},"backend/kubernetes","bfdadc",4369,"Documentation: Kubernetes mounts","2024-11-16T20:46:00Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4369",0.72711015,{"description":3110,"labels":3111,"number":3112,"owner":3024,"repository":3025,"state":3035,"title":3113,"updated_at":3114,"url":3115,"score":3116},"I will give up Woodpecker and return to Drone. reason\n1: GitHub issue #5262 with Woodpecker ui, switching log viewing will cause interruption and result in server shutdown in the background\n2: Plugin https://codeberg.org/woodpecker-plugins/docker-buildx/issues/268 I have been trying to mount the host volume but have not received a response\nBecause these two issues affect normal use and there has been no feedback from the management for a week, I have to give up",[],5276,"Giveup","2025-07-17T08:18:51Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/5276",0.7355831,{"description":3118,"labels":3119,"number":3120,"owner":3024,"repository":3025,"state":3035,"title":3121,"updated_at":3122,"url":3123,"score":3124},"hi, \r\n\r\nam using the example deployment in docs, upgraded to the latest image version available,\r\nand stripped down to bare Deployment/Service, the pod starts but no connectivity to it is available. (for example port fw to 8000)\r\n\r\nseems the DEBUG flag is not picked up, i've tried all kinds of combos from drone / woodpecker docs (as per below)\r\n\r\nAm using nfs-client pvc, the volume is created, for example: \r\n```\r\napps-woodpecker-pvc-pvc-fb557d9d-96c3-463e-8829-7e1dd6aaabc4\r\n```\r\nhowever i have a zero size drone.sqlite inside.\r\n\r\nam deploying on a functional k3s cluster, other apps use the same-style, nfs-client pv/pvc combos, disk is writable.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n```\r\n---\r\napiVersion: apps/v1\r\nkind: Deployment\r\nmetadata:\r\n name: woodpecker\r\n namespace: apps\r\n labels:\r\n app: woodpecker\r\nspec:\r\n replicas: 1\r\n selector:\r\n matchLabels:\r\n app: woodpecker\r\n template:\r\n metadata:\r\n labels:\r\n app: woodpecker\r\n annotations:\r\n prometheus.io/scrape: 'true'\r\n spec:\r\n containers:\r\n - image: laszlocloud/woodpecker-server:v0.13.0-rc.3\r\n imagePullPolicy: Always\r\n name: woodpecker\r\n env:\r\n - name: \"DRONE_LOGS_DEBUG\"\r\n value: \"true\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_DEBUG\"\r\n value: \"true\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_GITHUB\"\r\n value: \"true\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_HOST\"\r\n value: \"https://woodpecker.example.com\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_ADMIN\"\r\n value: \"root\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_SECRET\"\r\n value: \"##REDACTED##\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_GITHUB\"\r\n value: \"true\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_GITHUB_CLIENT\"\r\n value: \"##REDACTED##\"\r\n - name: \"DRONE_GITHUB_SECRET\"\r\n value: \"##REDACTED##\"\r\n - name: \"WOODPECKER_DEBUG\"\r\n value: 'true'\r\n volumeMounts:\r\n - name: sqlite-volume\r\n mountPath: /var/lib/drone\r\n volumes:\r\n - name: sqlite-volume\r\n persistentVolumeClaim:\r\n claimName: woodpecker-pvc\r\n---\r\napiVersion: v1\r\nkind: PersistentVolumeClaim\r\nmetadata:\r\n name: woodpecker-pvc\r\n namespace: apps\r\nspec:\r\n accessModes:\r\n - ReadWriteOnce\r\n storageClassName: nfs-client\r\n resources:\r\n requests:\r\n storage: 1Gi\r\n volumeMode: Filesystem\r\n---\r\nkind: Service\r\napiVersion: v1\r\nmetadata:\r\n name: woodpecker\r\n namespace: apps\r\nspec:\r\n type: ClusterIP\r\n selector:\r\n app: woodpecker\r\n ports:\r\n - protocol: TCP\r\n name: http\r\n port: 8000\r\n targetPort: 8000\r\n - protocol: TCP\r\n name: grpc\r\n port: 9000\r\n targetPort: 9000\r\n```",[],190,"Help with k8s faulty deployment","2021-04-26T14:46:27Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/190",0.74278855,["Reactive",3126],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",3129],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fwBhHEnbAQWkHMt_1yTGFqf-sP_wut4nSNYAVLuB4mrY":-1},"/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/5358"]