\r\n\n\n### Steps to reproduce\n\n.\n\n### Expected behavior\n\n_No response_\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n\"next-d126cf9e35\"\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]",[2935,2936],{"name":2868,"color":2869},{"name":2937,"color":2938},"ui","46DEA2",4677,"`tag` pipelines are missing avatar and commit title","2025-01-12T06:19:42Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4677",0.7904806,{"description":2945,"labels":2946,"number":2948,"owner":2877,"repository":2878,"state":2879,"title":2949,"updated_at":2950,"url":2951,"score":2952},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\r\n\r\nFor build steps, I might be fine with using a \":latest\" image, but for diagnostics I want to be able to see exactly which image was used for a build. \r\n\r\n### Suggested solution\r\n\r\nPrint the docker image hash as a log line\r\n\r\n### Alternative\r\n\r\n_No response_\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\r\n_No response_\r\n\r\n### Validations\r\n\r\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).\r\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\r\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[2947],{"name":2888,"color":2889},1414,"record build step docker image id","2023-08-20T17:13:01Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1414",0.7924289,{"description":2954,"labels":2955,"number":2958,"owner":2877,"repository":2878,"state":2959,"title":2960,"updated_at":2961,"url":2962,"score":2963},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\r\n\r\nIt doesn't make much sense to duplicate the repositories in the `last visited` block too, if there are \u003C=4 in total\r\n\r\n\r\nBesides, odd number of items look not so smooth.\r\n\r\n### Suggested solution\r\n\r\nDo not display `last visited` block if there are only four repositories\r\n\r\n### Alternative\r\n\r\nUse [repos pinning](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4424#issuecomment-2493207007)\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\r\nWoodpecker `next-9f0611d1a1`, Gitea `1.22.4`, Postgres `16`\r\n\r\n### Validations\r\n\r\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\r\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\r\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[2956,2957],{"name":2937,"color":2938},{"name":2915,"color":2916},4517,"closed","Do not show last visited repos if there is less than 4 in total","2025-01-20T15:23:54Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4517",0.75670904,{"description":2965,"labels":2966,"number":2969,"owner":2877,"repository":2878,"state":2959,"title":2970,"updated_at":2971,"url":2972,"score":2973},"### Component\n\nweb-ui\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nOnly 13 steps are shown while the configuration contains 22 steps, see\r\nhttps://woodie.osgeo.org/repos/30/pipeline/775\r\n\r\nI'm pretty sure it was working before upgrade to 1.0.0 docker container\r\n\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\nUsing docker.io/woodpeckerci/woodpecker-server:latest\r\nsha256:bb57d0c1ffae2fde73d90538774f2707a345f9762452ebbcc029d62e50b835b6\r\n\r\n{\"source\":\"https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker\",\"version\":\"1.0.0\"}\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\nIt may (or may not) be related to #1708\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A join our [Discord Chat Server](https://discord.gg/fcMQqSMXJy) or the [Matrix room](https://matrix.to/#/#woodpecker:matrix.org).",[2967,2968],{"name":2868,"color":2869},{"name":2937,"color":2938},2178,"Missing steps from web UI","2023-08-13T15:37:52Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2178",0.763958,{"description":2975,"labels":2976,"number":2979,"owner":2877,"repository":2878,"state":2959,"title":2980,"updated_at":2981,"url":2982,"score":2983},"### Component\n\nserver\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nWhen using plugin-trigger to trigger builds for other pipeline they will fail with error:\r\n\r\n```\r\n2023-12-07T10:59:20Z ERR failure to createPipelineItems for ***/*** | error=[linter] Invalid type. Expected: object, given: array; [linter] Invalid type. Expected: object, given: array\r\n2023-12-07T10:59:20Z ERR error=Error #01: failure to createPipelineItems for ***/***\r\n ip=10.255.0.2 latency=34.869784 method=POST path=/api/repos/1243/pipelines/1221 status=500 user-agent=Go-http-client/1.1\r\n ```\r\n \r\nPipeline itself will be created but won't be and can not be started because of this as it does not contain any steps or definition\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n{\"source\":\"https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker\",\"version\":\"2.0.0\"}\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A join our [Discord Chat Server](https://discord.gg/fcMQqSMXJy) or the [Matrix room](https://matrix.to/#/#woodpecker:matrix.org).",[2977,2978],{"name":2868,"color":2869},{"name":2912,"color":2913},2921,"Failure to create pipeline using API (plugin-trigger) if definition has lint warnings","2023-12-13T13:11:07Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2921",0.7752473,["Reactive",2985],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",2988],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fRhsfYujqgxM3kk55-8ZstSn83x6cgUml3YkW30ZQSMM":-1},"/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/999"]