\r\n\n\n### Steps to reproduce\n\n.\n\n### Expected behavior\n\n_No response_\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n\"next-d126cf9e35\"\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]",[3091,3092],{"name":3024,"color":3025},{"name":3093,"color":3094},"ui","46DEA2",4677,"`tag` pipelines are missing avatar and commit title","2025-01-12T06:19:42Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4677",0.7904806,{"description":3101,"labels":3102,"number":3104,"owner":3033,"repository":3034,"state":3035,"title":3105,"updated_at":3106,"url":3107,"score":3108},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\r\n\r\nFor build steps, I might be fine with using a \":latest\" image, but for diagnostics I want to be able to see exactly which image was used for a build. \r\n\r\n### Suggested solution\r\n\r\nPrint the docker image hash as a log line\r\n\r\n### Alternative\r\n\r\n_No response_\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\r\n_No response_\r\n\r\n### Validations\r\n\r\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).\r\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\r\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3103],{"name":3044,"color":3045},1414,"record build step docker image id","2023-08-20T17:13:01Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/1414",0.79242885,{"description":3110,"labels":3111,"number":3114,"owner":3033,"repository":3034,"state":3115,"title":3116,"updated_at":3117,"url":3118,"score":3119},"### Clear and concise description of the problem\r\n\r\nIt doesn't make much sense to duplicate the repositories in the `last visited` block too, if there are \u003C=4 in total\r\n\r\n\r\nBesides, odd number of items look not so smooth.\r\n\r\n### Suggested solution\r\n\r\nDo not display `last visited` block if there are only four repositories\r\n\r\n### Alternative\r\n\r\nUse [repos pinning](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4424#issuecomment-2493207007)\r\n\r\n### Additional context\r\n\r\nWoodpecker `next-9f0611d1a1`, Gitea `1.22.4`, Postgres `16`\r\n\r\n### Validations\r\n\r\n- [X] Checked that the feature isn't part of the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\r\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\r\n- [X] Check that there isn't already an [issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that request the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.",[3112,3113],{"name":3093,"color":3094},{"name":3071,"color":3072},4517,"closed","Do not show last visited repos if there is less than 4 in total","2025-01-20T15:23:54Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/4517",0.75670904,{"description":3121,"labels":3122,"number":3125,"owner":3033,"repository":3034,"state":3115,"title":3126,"updated_at":3127,"url":3128,"score":3129},"### Component\n\nweb-ui\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nOnly 13 steps are shown while the configuration contains 22 steps, see\r\nhttps://woodie.osgeo.org/repos/30/pipeline/775\r\n\r\nI'm pretty sure it was working before upgrade to 1.0.0 docker container\r\n\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\nUsing docker.io/woodpeckerci/woodpecker-server:latest\r\nsha256:bb57d0c1ffae2fde73d90538774f2707a345f9762452ebbcc029d62e50b835b6\r\n\r\n{\"source\":\"https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker\",\"version\":\"1.0.0\"}\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\nIt may (or may not) be related to #1708\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A join our [Discord Chat Server](https://discord.gg/fcMQqSMXJy) or the [Matrix room](https://matrix.to/#/#woodpecker:matrix.org).",[3123,3124],{"name":3024,"color":3025},{"name":3093,"color":3094},2178,"Missing steps from web UI","2023-08-13T15:37:52Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2178",0.763958,{"description":3131,"labels":3132,"number":3135,"owner":3033,"repository":3034,"state":3115,"title":3136,"updated_at":3137,"url":3138,"score":3139},"### Component\n\nserver\n\n### Describe the bug\n\nWhen using plugin-trigger to trigger builds for other pipeline they will fail with error:\r\n\r\n```\r\n2023-12-07T10:59:20Z ERR failure to createPipelineItems for ***/*** | error=[linter] Invalid type. Expected: object, given: array; [linter] Invalid type. Expected: object, given: array\r\n2023-12-07T10:59:20Z ERR error=Error #01: failure to createPipelineItems for ***/***\r\n ip=10.255.0.2 latency=34.869784 method=POST path=/api/repos/1243/pipelines/1221 status=500 user-agent=Go-http-client/1.1\r\n ```\r\n \r\nPipeline itself will be created but won't be and can not be started because of this as it does not contain any steps or definition\n\n### System Info\n\n```shell\n{\"source\":\"https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker\",\"version\":\"2.0.0\"}\n```\n\n\n### Additional context\n\n_No response_\n\n### Validations\n\n- [X] Read the [Contributing Guidelines](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).\n- [X] Read the [docs](https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/intro).\n- [X] Check that there isn't [already an issue](https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues) that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.\n- [X] Checked that the bug isn't fixed in the `next` version already [https://woodpecker-ci.org/faq#which-version-of-woodpecker-should-i-use]\n- [X] Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A join our [Discord Chat Server](https://discord.gg/fcMQqSMXJy) or the [Matrix room](https://matrix.to/#/#woodpecker:matrix.org).",[3133,3134],{"name":3024,"color":3025},{"name":3068,"color":3069},2921,"Failure to create pipeline using API (plugin-trigger) if definition has lint warnings","2023-12-13T13:11:07Z","https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/issues/2921",0.7752473,["Reactive",3141],{},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",3144],{"$fTRc1wZytZ_XrK4EfJfei_Sz-An4H4Yy6syhVxH_PVJc":-1,"$fRhsfYujqgxM3kk55-8ZstSn83x6cgUml3YkW30ZQSMM":-1},"/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/999"]